Grizzly Man Essay

Grizzly ManIn Grizzly Manamong the controversy steamy by the manner of Tread tumesce, the central desire expressed in the film is that the temperament is and then electroneutral and diversity should non cross the border gillyflower between man and spirit.Wild faunas are not friends of merciful. Treadwell raise all his heart to the cause of defend the cuts. He repeated in his films for mevery times that he loved them and he was forgeting to die for them. He tended to attribute them like many state do to the dogs and cats, but he forgot they were not those subdue pets. He touched bears in a way that seemed to irritate them. He by chance had a belief and confidence that the bears also saw him as their friend and treat him differently. simply in fact they didnt. In the narrators opinion, the common denominator of the humanity is not harmony, hostility and murder. Treadwell spent 13 years with the bears and he thought it was a wonderful and simpler world, he even valued to become a bear, but in reality it is a hash world. In those big and infuriated bears eyes, they see all nutriment and they n forever regard him as a friend. The narrator tells this observation at the endfrom all the faces, all the bears that Treadwell ever filmed, I discovered no kin send out, no understanding, no mercy. I see exclusively the overwhelming indifference of nature.There is an final invisible line between bear and human. The line has been respected by autochthonous people and the majority of the public. They know it is a very different world from the virtuoso where human lives. when you cross the line, you pay the price. the curator of the Kodiaks Alutiiq Museum mentioned this principle that has been strictly observed for 7000 years. He doesnt agree with Treadwells behavior of staying too intimately with bears. He believes that he has crossed the invisible boundary, that is, the line which has been mentioned above. So even if Treadwell was repeatedly d eclaring that his chief(prenominal) purpose was to protect bears from poachers, he didnt realize that his behavior was another large-minded of invasion of their habitat and he was doing a lot of damage to them. He got taut to those bears crazily and in un undue way.He violated the reasonable rule of the putting green that one should maintain at least 100 yards of distance from the bears. He lived with them and time-tested to relieve oneself the bears get used to the humanity of human, which was very dangerous for bears, and so on. As the narrator says in the movie, the best security for the animals is that of their habitat. all action of protecting animals by invading their habitat is not coaxing and of course throw outt do any good to them. Like Treadwell, during his 13 years, he didnt give bears any practical protection except dowry them a delicious dinner with his and his female childs bodies. animation of PiThe turn over presented in this movie is that human and fe rocious animals can co-exist amicablely if human can meet the pick needs of the animals and nature can give human want and direction to survive.Darwins theorythe survival of the fittest, emphasizes the fierce and somewhat ruthless skin of survival among the species and the individuals. It is indeed true in most cases. however in Life of Pi, it describes a picture of human and animals co-existence in a to a greater extent harmonious way and proves that their struggle and contradiction in terms are not so irreconcilable. In this movie, Pi was taught at his childhood by his father, that the animals, esp, the tiger, etc are not his friends. So at the first of the gasconade, Pi didnt opine to co-exist with the tiger. He had had the chance to kill it. plainly his virtuous nature didnt bequeath himself to do so. So he do the final decision to co-exist with this ferocious animal. He supplied the tiger with food and fresh wet to survive so that he himself would not become the din ner of it. The threat to severally other and the certain kind of peaceful co-existence helped them persevere to be saved at last. Even Pi himself admitted that the fear of Richard Parker kept me alert. I wouldnt survive without Richard Parker. humankind actually should be grateful to nature. reputation provides them with the animals living in it and therefore sustains humans biography. In the movie, nature is inert by the storm which caused the disaster of the ships sink and took away so many peoples lives. But on the other side, during the hopeless drift on the sea, nature also gave them food in the sea. It led him to the island when Pi had already lost his hope for survival, which made him remember the hope for life. Nature gave these seemingly coincidences to make for Pis survival from this disaster.Which kind of view do you agree with? analyze 2 different views presented in these two movies, the former is more persuasive and reasonable. discussion the relations between human and nature, people should always remember that nature is indeed indifferent and keep a proper(a) distance away from nature, especially the animals. Any human action which interferes with their natural life in an undue way will surely provoke the revenge of nature and pay a price for what they do. estimate of teachers view teacher may agree that nature is indifferent but to some extent human and can get along well with each other unless both of them take overt cross the borderline and do harm to the other. Because America is a nation which pays a lot attention to environment protection. They wear downt encourage too much intimacy with nature for they know the ruthless and indifferent nature, so they do a good job in establishing the wildlife reserves. But on the other hand, they love to be close to nature.